Stay up to date with Seopher.com by subscribing to the RSS feed, either in your browser or subscribe via email using the form below
Updates by EmailBy subscribing by email you’re also subscribing to the Seopher.com newsletter; a periodical email outlining new reviews, competitions and other subscriber-only content
Paying for a featured review is a great way to give your product, service or website exposure. For as little as $75 you can have a full review on the site forever.
Advertising Bundle! Review + Banner = $100Buy a review and get a 125x125 advert half price. Your banner gets displayed on over 526 pages for a full month.
Showing most recent 6 of 6 comments
But I don’t think wanting things to be hard is such a "bizarre reason". All the same, I have a huge amount of respect for the Ubuntu developers. They have put craploads of effort into making Linux user-friendly.
When it comes down to it, it is each individual’s choice to make a decision about what they use, be it Linux or Windows, Slackware or Ubuntu. However, having arguments about it just wastes everyone’s time. So use what you like, and be proud of it!
I really think a lot of Linux users are afraid of loosing the l33t status if Linux becomes too accessible. If anyone can get up and running with Linux in an hour we that use ’real distros’ have nothing to brag about anymore.
Then some are concerned about prorietary drivers and stuff like that, others are afraid Ubuntu will in some way eradicate the other ’real distros’.
Popularity is scary and can often feel threatening. If the eight million users were spread over several distros everyone would be happy, but when one single distro acquire such huge user base in such a short time people get suspicions.
For years we have discussed how we could make Linux more popular. Now that Ubuntu have broken some serious ground on that aspect it’s not at all good. The reason for the Ubuntu scare is complex but I really believe it will calm down and become just another choice.
It simply comes down to the fact that I don’t want a monopoly distro, if you have 1-3 popular distros then it becomes easy for hardware/software developers to support those and only those distros (software is only a real problem for closed source that is still important in Linux, like Oracle’s databases). If you have no distro with >5% of the market then you have to find a way to support all distros equaliy like useing the LSB.
There are other reasons, like the fact Ubuntu is IMO not actually such a good distro, and the overexposure of Ubuntu in the news, but the one above is the main one
chances are you cannot see what another person is trying to tell you.
chances are you will feel one is better than the other (vi against emac, kde against gnome) etc etc etc
Linux distro is like a dress, it may be suitable for you but may looks damn ugly on another.
Add the above together, Linux is somethihng you use and keep your big mouth shut, cause you are already blinded by your distro. Trying to analyse the situation only makes things worst.
Look at yourself as a religious fanatic and you will understand what I mean. The more people writes about this or that distro, the more divided Linux will become as we will be more rooted to our own miserable views.
the biggest problem stopping linux going more mainstream (and maybe whats stopping it) is the nature of the beast
the fact it is "community" based means that some people will not move over to it
just to clarify something, i am a linux user ive been using gentoo as my main distribution the last few months and i love it but i deal with alot of people who are not into computing and cannot understand how the linux community works
Add Your Comments