Stay up to date with Seopher.com by subscribing to the RSS feed, either in your browser or subscribe via email using the form below
Updates by EmailBy subscribing by email you’re also subscribing to the Seopher.com newsletter; a periodical email outlining new reviews, competitions and other subscriber-only content
Paying for a featured review is a great way to give your product, service or website exposure. For as little as $75 you can have a full review on the site forever.
Advertising Bundle! Review + Banner = $100Buy a review and get a 125x125 advert half price. Your banner gets displayed on over 526 pages for a full month.
Showing most recent 14 of 14 comments
And open source programs aren’t worse than their proprietary alternatives. I can do more with Gimp than with Photoshop, because I like Gimp and I’m used to it. Gimp is more powerful, it just misses liquify.. Unless someone has created some plugins that do the same things.
I don’t think that I should be supporting some proprietary software at the expense of good open source software.
A good example is Dia vs Visio.
I would forgive Dia for not being as good a product as Visio and continue to use it so the developers can have my feedback. It does what I want.
Visio is a expensive piece of software which wouldn’t be hard for me to pirate as I work at a large company, but what would be the point?
I would be perpetuating a proprietary file format, continuing the vendor lock-in and perpetuating the need to keep the pirate copy (or buy it,but why would I want to do that?)
One day Dia will be a very good piece of software, I will have helped that and I will reap the reward.
THIS is the point of using open source software.
If there is a free alternative that works half decently, people will choose it over having to pay X amount of dollars.
btw. You have a magic quote issue. You might want to fix it.
I use Paint.NET, it’s SOOOO much better than both GIMP and Photoshop IMO, I love it!
Siddhartha Gandhi
http://gvhighlights.blogspot.com
The question makes an assumption (that you pirate(d) software)
It’s a stupid question.
Since switching to Linux, the only thing I have pirated is the Windows A/V codecs, since it is illegal in the US to install them without paying a fee to MSFT.
F/OSS just makes me feel so much better about myself. Proprietary software begins to just seem dirty.
Now that’s an interesting idea. Open source I look at more as a resource for software for what ever reason could not would not be successful as commercial product.
I still would prefer to pirate useful but excessively expensive commercial applications.
Not to say that open source software is less useful its often more useful in most cases it’s just sometime you have to use commercial products.
Personally, I\’m pleased OSS has given me an alternative to pirated commercial software. Now I just need to find some sweet Creative Commons movies...
Add Your Comments