Want to stay up to date? Then why not subscribe to the RSS feed?

Or subscribe by email
Interested in Advertising? I sometimes have 125x125 banner slots available for only $40pcm. Reviews only cost $40 too.
I'm nearly fully booked so get in touch now
Posted on Sunday 13th of January 2008 at 15:44 in SEO

Say goodbye to SEO as you know it, latent semantic indexing explained

I'm forever reading posts by the ill-informed that "SEO is dying" or something along those lines and while it's not strictly true, it's not strictly false either. To avoid being deliberately ambiguous let me explain what the hell I'm on about.

The formula for prosperous SEO has remained the same for a while now; keyword density, proper page mark up, proper content mark up and high quality backlinks. A lot of people are paid a lot of money to become experts at these concepts, but SEO is looking to change a little...

Latent semantic indexing might be here already
LSI is a different mechanism to the conventional keyword density one we're used to. SEOBook referred to LSI:


Latent semantic indexing allows a search engine to determine what a page is about outside of specifically matching search query text.

LSI considers documents that have many words in common to be semantically close, and ones with few words in common to be semantically distant. This simple method correlates surprisingly well with how a human being, looking at content, might classify a document collection.


Right so what does that really mean?
LSI will rate you higher for using higher level language and a variety of keywords. To rank highly you don't need (or even want) to stuff your content with expected search terms; ideally you should use a larger set of synonyms.

So how does this affect my content?
Right so right now you're trying to rank highly for "Search engine optimisation". The current mechanism would reward you for stuffing your content with that keyphrase because the relvancy of your page would increase (because users searching for that term will find 15 instances of it).

LSI is going to pull your content in the opposite direction. To rank highly for "search engine optimisation" you'll be better placed using suitable synonyms like "search engine marketing", "search engine ranking" etc. This completely detracts from the current way of doing things.

Give it a go!
Some clever chaps at shcl.co.uk have worked out how to demonstrate a basic form of LSI at work on Google. Using the link below you'll be able to see how Google ranks a search for "greeting cards" using only synonyms:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=en&hs=dJC&q=%7Egreeting+cards+-greeting+cards&btnG=Search

Ultimately it could mean you're paying SEO analysts for no reason
That's the horrifying thing that springs to my mind. If you're paying for analysts to keywordify (new word I've just made up) your content to rank better it might be folly. Sure it might be working now but Google have just been fiddling with their algorithms again so how long before your keyword-rich pages stop being so profitable?

While the validity of the claim of "SEO is dying" is questionable there is an element of truth to it. SEO as you know it might be changing rather than dying. If you're still interested read a more in depth explanation of LSI over at searchnewz.com. No need to panic though, good content will win overall - just make sure you have some.

Enjoy this article? Why not subscribe to the full RSS feed?


Did you like this article?
If you liked this article then please show your support and give me a Digg. If you'd like to get in touch with me, email me at steven.york@seopher.com
Want to stay updated?
Sign up to RSS updates by email (or subscribe to the full RSS feed)

Enter your email address:


Add a comment






Comments

Showing most recent 4 of 4 comments

Really it still comes down to keyword densities, anchor text, and all that good stuff. Only now we would likely need to use more semantic varieties of keywords in our pages and in our anchor text. May also mean an increased need for links from topical sites in such a way as to cover that wider range of semantic terms related to the main keyword.
Axemedia
Wouldn’t it be good if you could (with a set of sliders) tell Google what’s important to you, design, lots of pictures, good grammar, pretty lady’s, and it would then order the search depending on ur preferences, not what they believe to be right at the time.
Daniel Sharp
I think it might be upon us already. Google have been doing a lot of stuff recently so it might be this they’ve been doing.,
James
I’m going to ask my SEO analyst about this... I bet he tells me it’s nothing to be worried about though. Although he would because I pay him money.
Po