Want to stay up to date? Then why not subscribe to the RSS feed?

Or subscribe by email
Reviews
$100
now $60!
Cheap reviews in March: $40 discount, now only $60!! Limited number of places so
book yours now before they're gone
Recent Comments
Posted on Sunday 22nd of April 2007 at 12:52 in Linux

Review of Ubuntu Feisty Fawn 7.04 - final release

I pondered whether it was worth my time reviewing a distro as popular as Ubuntu considering how much it has been dominating Linux news this week. However it would be stupid to continue my documentation of the battle for "most usable Linux" without delving into one of this years biggest releases.

While I'm looking into how I review distros again (to be documented later) I'll continue reviewing to the old standards that I defined in mid-March.

ubuntu

Brief background
Ubuntu is the main contender for my "most usable Linux 2007" title so it's not difficult to understand that while I don't "love" it, I respect it. Ubuntu has always impressed me through how much it's doing to reform the image surrounding the community and how usable it's developers are making it become.

What I'm looking for<;/strong>
All I'm doing is evaluating how easy the distro performs a few basic tasks that I consider fundamental for "normal" use (I'm looking into how I review distros again so this is subject to become more in-depth later). The distro needs to network to my current setup, obtain a media file (normally an episode of Family Guy), play it without issue, allow for full web browsing, offer easy access to common applications. The review must also be written, formatted and published from within the review environment.

Reviewing Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn



Network to my current setup
While installation was a fairly slow but simple affair it was the networking that made me sit back, put my hands behind my head and say to my partner "this is VERY impressive". The NTFS R/W driver has been available for some time but I've not seen such a slick and effortless integration than in Feisty. I loaded up the "Places" menu, selected "Connect to server" and from that list I selected "Windows Share".

"Surely they can't have this fully working" I questioned as Ubuntu scoured my network for something to hook onto. Sure enough it located my Windows network "badger" and continued to allow me to browse through all the shared folders. I could even interact with it as you would expect from a Windows machine - executing files directly from their shared location.

ubuntu ntfs

Play a video file
I pulled across an episode of Family Guy and selected to play it. What I was presented with was indicative of the Herd 5 release I reviewed at the end of March. A screen explaining that I didn't have the required codec and whether to authorise searching for a download of the required one.

ubuntu codecs

I was presented with a list of packages (ranked by popularity) and the decision whether to download them or not. After a moment of downloading my selected package the video played without issue. So while 7.04 doesn't manage anything more than was offered in the Herd5 release; it still manages to impress by making video playback about as easy as possible (short of automatically downloading required codecs).

ubuntu codec install

Brief conclusions
I'm not going to go into the depths of reviewing Ubuntu because it doesn't need it. It comes with standard applications such as OpenOffice to allow you to immediately continue your Microsoft Office exploits. Add in the familiar face of Synaptic and the world is your oyster. If you're unfamiliar with what Synaptic is, have a read through my article "Synaptic Package Manager - the best kind of evil". Basically what I'm saying is that it's easy to see where the time has been spent in the development; but if you've played with Edgy then you'll know what to expect for the most part.

Ubuntu Feisty Fawn is a very good release, confidently flying the flag for usable Linux



While Ubuntu isn't my favourite distro around at the moment it's difficult not to respect the amount of thought and hard work that goes into it. It's also not hard to see why it has such a supportive and thriving community behind it.

I think it'd be foolish for new-users to not consider Ubuntu as their first distro because of how comprehensive it's functionality seems to be. I recon Kubuntu is a better place to start but I think the whole KDE/Gnome decision is one best left to personal preference.

So all in all, a good distro but there's superficially little here that wasn't in the Herd5 release I reviewed a while ago. Good work though, this one will be popular.

Enjoy this article? Why not subscribe to the full RSS feed?




Did you like this article?
If you liked this article then please show your support and give me a Digg. If you'd like to get in touch with me, email me at steven.york@seopher.com
Want to stay updated?
Sign up to RSS updates by email (or subscribe to the full RSS feed)

Enter your email address:

Comments

Showing most recent 12 of 12 comments [View all comments]

I agree with manmath after reading his blog http://pclinuxos2007.blogspot.com. Right, PCLinuxOS Gnome version will be on the block soon to conqueror the ubuntu base for all the good reasons.
krishna panda

Balanced review but Ubuntu falls next to PCLinuxOS. Visit http://pclinuxos2007.blogspot.com to know why. PCLinuxOS Gnome version will be on the block soon to conqueror the ubuntu base for all the good reasons.
manmath sahu

I installed it last night from a DVD from the Linux magazine. I am impressed by how simple the installation was. However, I need kppp to connect my usb wireless modem to the internet and it is not on the DVD. Is there a similar program by another name?
Ross Stacey

hi there..

To any linux user out there: If you think buntu < or derivatives> are going to attract the kind of userbase it needs to compete with windows and offer those using it a viable and ’useable’ alternative then your not only delussional , but likely stonned out of your brains. As noted earlier people ’want it to work out of the box’ and not have to fiddle with manual install ( if you even known about it or where to find it ) of ’NONFREE SOFTWARE’ . That is the reality , and if you dont get it , you aren’t in touch with the actual goals of linux which was made by linus for a ’free’ alternative’ not because ALL OF IT MUST ALWAYS BE FREE; I agree with prior poster, in saying that all you will succede in doing is driving people ’back ’ to windows where all those things are automated for its lucky userbase. We all ’get’ the idea of OSS, but to say it should be used to exclusion of non OSS when that non OSS is the only real deal going atm ( feel free to write your favorite vendor instead of being activist jerks to people who just want a useable, free, stable OS ) , is not only ignorant but also mean spirited and infantile at best.

So often I see RTFM attitudes ( deal with OUR way or go BACK to windows where you belong bitch! ) which is terribly indicative of nasty viscious thought processes, with little regard for anyone else but their own zealotry to the exclusion of anything else. That is what happens with zealotry it overcomes its self worth, to the extent it shows what small minds its spewing from.

I am just so sick honestly of a good OS being overrun by zealots whom care only for this latest OSS ONLY attitude, and if you dont fit in that mindset then your worthless. Wake up and smell the roses, because Sam, pclinuxos and other OS’s will destroy this simple mindedness really quick, and I can’t wait to smell the freedom it brings back to linux.

I want to leave on a positive note, because while I see these things as bad omen, I do see good in buntu mindset. I do hope other distros leading the way with ’out of box full useability’, will also consider very needed things like NTFS R/W ( of course not mandatory but hey ), and auto crash handling reporting ( which sends report for you after choosing ’yes’, cause face it linux needs solid bug reports made easy for non techie types ) .

have a wonderful day now.

COJ

As for propietary and non-free drivers/software - if you’re so horny for that then why aren’t you using windows? Because that’s what Windows is - non-free and proprietary. Ubuntu wants to be a completely free (and free as in "speech" not free as in "beer") distro. Feisty introduces the option to easily install non-free drivers, but I heartily agree that non-free drivers shouldn’t be default on new installs simply because the whole idea is to take a stand AGAINST non-free software.
---------------
what a ’asshole’ish comment yourself..pot calling kettle black dear?

use your brain instead of your ’red’ -neck maybe ? ;)

..did it ever ’occur’ to you maybe that those proprietary ( while I agree at least over the long haul will be gone in lieu of free standards BUT my dear that day is NOT TODAY>.HELLO!!!!!!! ) ’standards’ that exist atm are because not enoug people are wriiting websites asking for ogg/theora or whatever is deemed free enough for all you zealots who think stuffing OSS OR BUST to vendors is their necessary modus operandi??

yeah right get lives...

chow baby


cya!

COJ

DaveMC: Mint and Mepis are both Ubuntu derivatives, you do realize that right?
Michael

DaveMC: I’m sorry that you’re a stupid asshole. My apologies for you not using your brain.

Why doesn’t *Ubuntu have what you call "full functionality"? Because most of the crap that you refer to as "full functionality" is still in early alpha-stages! They are not ready for production-use, and I think that while most people like new and somewhat bleeding-edge the priority should be that stuff should be stable. Sure, all that crap you’ve tried might be stable enough for you, on your computer - but that’s not a guarantee that it’ll be stable anywhere else in the world. Hence, Ubuntu and its siblings prefer to scale things back in order to present a stable experience to the user.

My guess is that you’re the kind of asshole who shouts "LOL OMFG A NOOB!!!" every time you see someone who doesn’t recompile their kernel every time a new one comes out.

As for propietary and non-free drivers/software - if you’re so horny for that then why aren’t you using windows? Because that’s what Windows is - non-free and proprietary. Ubuntu wants to be a completely free (and free as in "speech" not free as in "beer") distro. Feisty introduces the option to easily install non-free drivers, but I heartily agree that non-free drivers shouldn’t be default on new installs simply because the whole idea is to take a stand AGAINST non-free software.

But then again, your attitude indicates more that you’re a Linux-user because you want to be superior to everyone else and writing those inane little comments about "M$" and dissing every distro and every user who doesn’t do things exactly like you do.

It’s people like you who give free software-users a bad reputation.
Rebenga

kubuntu feisty with beryl - since herd4 with better bluetooth support than other os - and even vegastrike runs smooth on top, and this on a 1.7laptop.
- i have no more wishes
mk

Cant help but agree with the above comments. The Buntus are far far behind the real leading distros like PClos, Sabayon, SimplyMepis, Mint, and SuSe which have full functionality included on a full install. The Buntus shy away from what they call "non free" software like video drivers LOLOLOL!!

Best thing to do at this point in the game is to avoid showing new users this distro as it will likely drive them back to M$’s loving, yet ever hungry arms. Instead, use one of the other mentioned above distro’s so that they can see what a truly good distro is capable of. Please, Buntu folks, do the Linux world a favor and either step up to the plate or put the bat down.
davemc

to nanotech: Canonical offers support for Ubuntu
lognok

While I kind of like *Buntu, we are still looking at SuSe (SLES/SLED10) for company use. OpenSuSe is rather nice and in use on several laptops and desktops for continual testing. From a business perspective support is key and it really doesn’t matter on the proprietary driver issues; we want Linux to work, time is money. RedHat has priced its self out of our market (CentOS is in limited use though) so the only quality "Commercial" distro is SuSe (though we did test Xandros Server and Business Desk 4 was rather nice, support was something else though)
nanotech

I downloaded and installed it on Thursday. A nice release, although I think PCLOS is still going to be the better release this year. We’ve got Gutsy Gibbon to come in 6 months though!
Harpo


Add a comment





Prove you are real